By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Rumor: Bethesda's Upcoming Indiana Jones Game Might Not be an Xbox Exclusive

Rumor: Bethesda's Upcoming Indiana Jones Game Might Not be an Xbox Exclusive - News

by William D'Angelo , posted on 01 June 2022 / 2,741 Views

Bethesda Softworks and MachineGames announced in January of last year it had partnered with Lucasfilm Games to develop a new Indiana Jones game with an original story.

Windows Central's Jez Corden on the Xbox Two podcast said he heard the Indiana Jones game was not an Xbox exclusive. However, he said that was a while ago and plans could have changed.

"The only information I’ve had on Indiana Jones is that it wasn’t exclusive, but that was a long time ago, maybe something has change," said Corden.

Bethesda previously said it would not be sharing more information for some time as it is very early on in development.


A life-long and avid gamer, William D'Angelo was first introduced to VGChartz in 2007. After years of supporting the site, he was brought on in 2010 as a junior analyst, working his way up to lead analyst in 2012 and taking over the hardware estimates in 2017. He has expanded his involvement in the gaming community by producing content on his own YouTube channel and Twitch channel. You can contact the author on Twitter @TrunksWD.


More Articles

27 Comments
The Fury (on 30 May 2022)

Surprised anyone thought it was. It was announced before MS went on their spending spree right? when it was commissioned, Disney probably wanted it on as many consoles as possible as that is what Bethesda at the time was doing with their games. MS buying them won't change the terms of that deal.

  • +22
NextGen_Gamer The Fury (on 02 June 2022)

I actually could see this one going either way. I'm sure you are right about how when it was commissioned, it was probably for PS5/Xbox Series/PC; it is likely last-gen was left out from the get-go since this is a 2023/2024 release. Depending on how far into development it was when the Bethesda deal went down, it is possible for platforms to be renegotiated at someone's discretion (Disney's maybe). If dropping PS5 dev at that point will save X amount of costs, while predicting that having only Xbox/PC platforms left will still amount to a satisfactory X amount of sales, and everyone signs off on it, then it could become Xbox-console exclusive.

  • 0
Imaginedvl (on 30 May 2022)

Well, who started to even think it would be exclusive? It makes no sense.

Indiana Jones was started by Bethesda BEFORE they got acquired so the contract was very likely for all platforms (I doubt very much Bethesda would have gone the exclusive way before that).
And Microsoft would have to pay a truckload of money to make it happen after that which is doubtfull.

Also, people need to stop taking/quoting all of those fake "insiders" seriously; the Jez, Jeff, and companies are always coming up with random stuff and the majority of them are always false. But again, people stick to the few things they "guessed" right like everybody.

  • +11
Dimsum42 (on 30 May 2022)

If bethesda are making it and it ends up being a 1st first person game, then this game is going to be shit. Indiana jones should be an action 3rd person, it would be a perfect fit.

  • +4
G2ThaUNiT (on 30 May 2022)

I originally was thinking that it wasn’t exclusive since it’s a licensed deal and was probably signed prior to the Microsoft purchase. Either way, I’m excited for a modern Indiana Jones game! Last IJ game I played was Fate of Atlantis from the LucasArts point and click adventure days xD

  • +4
DonFerrari G2ThaUNiT (on 31 May 2022)

There are some licensed games that are exclusive. But those are when well the company developing those games are platform holders, which in Bethesda case at the time of the deal wasn't yet.

  • -2
Azzanation (on 30 May 2022)

Well good on them, multiplats is good for everyone

  • 0
kazuyamishima (on 30 May 2022)

So similar to MLB the show case then

  • 0
Comment was deleted...
SecondWar twintail (on 30 May 2022)

They’ve usually altered plans if they weren’t publicly announced before the acquisition, although the games I’m thinking of (Starfield) aren’t licensed titled.

  • -1
Azzanation twintail (on 30 May 2022)

You can pay out contracts but why would MS want to? They make more money releasing multiplatform

  • 0
Comment was deleted...
Azzanation twintail (on 30 May 2022)

All contracts have an exit plan. Especially if a company owns all stakes within the company, its even easier.

If their is a contract, MS wont cancel it because they will milk the money it will make on its multiplatform release instead of spending money only to make less money long term. Would make zero sense for a buisness.

Also there might not even be a contract, MS arent afraid of having some games go multiplat which we have seen in the past.

  • 0
DonFerrari Azzanation (on 31 May 2022)

And the exiting plan could be don't make the game instead of turn it exclusive. Again you haven't seem the contract and is just speculating.
MS for the purchases have keep contracts intact for all we know as well.
For your "they make more money by being multiplatform" there are many. many, many of their games that won't show in competing console, which well seems to contradict your statement. Unless of course you think MS choses options that make less money (which would make them liable towards their stockholders).

  • +4
Azzanation DonFerrari (on 31 May 2022)

As a business stand point, the money is in the software and the more software they sell, the more money they make. Software > Hardware.

The only reason MS don't release all all their games on opposition platforms is due to the service wars.

Did you forget MS wanted GamePass on PS4? They have no issue putting their games on PS4 if the service comes with it.

They need some sort of collateral to push their service.

  • 0
DonFerrari Azzanation (on 31 May 2022)

PC gives no colateral. You will have to face it one day, exclusives help push sales of HW or subs.

  • 0
Azzanation DonFerrari (on 01 June 2022)

PC is a universal market not controlled by any brand. MS clearly see the benefits of PC gaming which is exactly why all day one exclusives release on PC and Sony isn't far behind that plan.

  • 0
Imaginedvl twintail (on 30 May 2022)

That^

  • -1
smroadkill15 (on 30 May 2022)

We have no idea. Anyone saying, "Well it was announced before the Acquistion." They announced it during the acquisition phase and never stated any platforms, so it certainly leaves room for discussions between Xbox and Machine Games to decide how they want to go about it. Also, it hasn't stopped Xbox from making games that were originally planned as a multiplatform into a console exclusive ie Starfield and Redfall. This is a bit different since Indiana Jones is a licensed IP, but that hasn't stopped games from being exclusive in the past. We'll just have to wait and see.

  • -1
DonFerrari smroadkill15 (on 31 May 2022)

Before an acquisition is approved and done the company is still independent.

  • -1
smroadkill15 DonFerrari (on 31 May 2022)

We have no idea and making a claim like, "It was announced before the acquisition" doesn't mean much when we never were told any platforms. Plenty of games released or will release as Xbox console exclusives that weren't planned too originally.

  • 0
DonFerrari smroadkill15 (on 31 May 2022)

Sure it is a possibility. But don't remember Bethesda in recent time making their games exclusives to Xbox, do you?

  • -1
smroadkill15 DonFerrari (on 31 May 2022)

Starfield and Redfall.

  • 0
DonFerrari smroadkill15 (on 31 May 2022)

You mean games for which she had no license deals or with Sony so changing to exclusive (and well not even released) didn't change it. Bet you would look funny at me if I listed Deathloop and Tokyo Ghostwire as since they were exclusive for PS then Indiana Jones is certainly PS exclusives.

  • -1
LudicrousSpeed (on 30 May 2022)

Makes sense.

Licensed games should always be multi platform imho.

  • -1
DonFerrari (on 31 May 2022)

It is possible that the deal for the game was signed before the purchase and had multiplatform on the contract.

  • -2
Comment was deleted...