Pokemon Legends: Arceus in the UK Had the 4th Biggest Pokemon Launch Ever - Sales

Personally I find it more engaging due to changes to the gameplay formula. It takes a little while to get going but I’m now find I have I’m pushing on to explore the game-world more rather than just going through the motion in SwSh.
And whilst I wouldn’t compare it to Dark Souls, it’s definitely more challenging than SwSh.

This game is kind of what I wanted those games to be
In fact, if legends was the gen 8 of pokemon, if each area had a town, with a gym for pokemon battles and maybe contests, as well as what legends arceus does so far it would be amazing imo

I would be happy with a "choose your story" pokemon game, could be a pokemon champion, a researcher or contest superstar

To me i would rather have the classic BDSP style but better and Legend's to coexist. I feel like Sw/Sh is a mixt of both but has the qualities of none. The classic areas were short as hell and easy and the open area felt like a draft.

Seems everyone is pretty happy from the switch from the old stale formula to the Legends formula. Sw/Sh was clearly starting to go in this direction with the wild areas, which was the coolest part of that game, so it makes sense they would continue that transition as they did here. Sw/Sh sold very well because it was the first high end pokemon main series game, but it is pretty clear people were getting tired of the stale same old 20+ year old formula, hence the collective sigh of relief by basically everyone with this game (finally something new in pokemon!). If you want to play the old formula you've got Sw/Sh and D/P remake and probably future remakes as well. But this is clearly where the series was starting to head with Sw/Sh and now they made that into a full game and it has brought life back to pokemon. Just as BotW is clearly the formula Zelda games will take for now on, and you can also play older Zeldas if you prefer the old formula, same with Pokemon now.

Graphics are not the be all and end all of games. I’ve seen many in the last year or two that look great graphically but the games themselves are terrible.

This entire post
"I" don't find the game fun so everyone else is also "required" to find it bad or else!

The only reason Sony and m$ would get criticism for games not looking as good is only because they've trained their audience to expect that.
Nintendo fans don't (often) care about that, it's the very reason some middling devs and indi devs sell better on the switch anyway.

And the world is not empty, anybody saying that hasn't played the game or at least gotten very far

Yeah the graphics are for the most part mediocre. Actually it looks real pretty looking out over the landscape, but the details are very lazy (pop-in/lack of draw distance on details of the landscape, terrible textures). And yeah there is no excuse for that. But notice how you are only talking about graphics! Graphics are lazy but perfectly fine for playing the game. They don't take away from the experience. But I know I know pokemon fans have to find SOMETHING to hate with every pokemon game as it seems they like hating pokemon more than playing it.

Not sure why you are putting "revolutionary gameplay" in quotes and saying it's not revolutionary literally three times in your comment considering I never said it is revolutionary lol. What it is is a very needed evolutionary jump for pokemon from what had become a very stale formula. If literally the only thing you care about is graphics (which from your comment seems to be you) then yeah you won't like the game. But for anyone looking to play a fun pokemon game, which I'm guessing is 99%+ people who like pokemon, this is a great pickup and it's great to see it getting strong sales for the series.