By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Obama Intimately Tied To Carbon Trading Scam

Obama Intimately Tied To Carbon Trading Scam

 

President helped fund profiteers of carbon tax program he is now seeking to implement

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Monday, March 30, 2009

A combination of interesting mainstream and alternative media reports reveal compelling links between president Obama and a privately owned carbon trading group, which also has direct ties with elitist groups such as the Club of Rome and the Trilateral Commission.

Judi McLeod’s excellent article for Canada Free Press, which she expanded from a Fox News piece, highlights how years before he became president, Obama helped directly fund a carbon trading exchange that will likely play a critical role in the proposed cap-and-trade carbon reduction program.

The charity was the Joyce Foundation on whose board of directors Obama served and which gave nearly $1.1 million in two separate grants that were “instrumental in developing and launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which now calls itself “North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide.”

Essentially Obama helped fund the profiteers of the carbon taxation program that he is now seeking to steer through Congress.

McLeod also notes that The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) has direct ties to both Al Gore and Maurice Strong, two figures intimately involved with a long standing movement to use the theory of man made global warming as a mechanism for profit and social engineering.

Gore’s investment company, Generation Investment Management, which sells carbon offset opportunities, is the largest shareholder of CCX.

While Maurice Strong, who is regularly credited as founding father of the modern environmental movement, serves on the board of directors of CCX. Strong was a leading initiate of the Earth Summit in the early 90s, where the theory of global warming caused by CO2 generated by human activity was most notably advanced.

(Article continues below)

 

While McLeod’s article highlights the cronyism and corporate dealings behind this set up, we should also add the fact that both Gore and Strong come from a stable of elite groups that have long sought to use the environmental movement to advance their agendas.

Strong, who was groomed by David Rockefeller to eventually serve as Director of the Rockefeller Foundation, is also a member of the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Club of Rome.

Gore too comes from the Club of Rome clique.

Lets take a look at the connections these groups have to the environmental movement.

In 1990, writes veteran reporter Jim Tucker, the Bilderbergers adopted climate change as the preferred model to impose global government and reintroduce serfdom. “Like the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group discovered the issue of environmental deterioration. Bilderbergers embraced a report from the Trilateral Commission that year on the environment, because the potential profit in cleaning up the mess would be immense.”

The following year, the Club of Rome think tank published The First Global Revolution, a book suggesting a draconian neo-Malthusianism approach will solve the world’s “problems”, in fact a problem the global elite has with humanity.

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill,” the book states. “All these dangers are caused by human intervention,” and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

Richard Haass, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, expanded on this topic in his article, State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era. According to Haass, a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming and terrorism, both invented as the Club of Rome suggested.

“Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to address the threat of global climate change,” writes Haass. “The goal should be to redefine sovereignty for the era of globalization, to find a balance between a world of fully sovereign states and an international system of either world government or anarchy.”

In the past, the Club of Rome has resorted to deceptive tactics in order to support their plans. In 1972, the Club of Rome, along with an MIT team released a report called Limits to growth. The report stated that we were to reach an environmental holocaust by the year 2000 due to overpopulation and other environmental problems. Support for their conclusions was gathered by results from a computer model. Aurelio Peccei, one of the founders of the Club of Rome, later confessed that the computer program had been written to give the desired results.

As we reported two years ago, During the secretive Trilateral Commission group meeting in March 2007, elitists gathered to formulate policy on how best they could exploit global warming fearmongering to ratchet up taxes and control over how westerners live their lives.

Why is this so concerning? Because groups such as the Club of Rome are contracted out by our own governments and the UN to prepare ‘Policy Guidance Documents’ which they use in formulating their policies and programs. How come the Club of Rome gets the gig? Simply because many high ranking UN and government officials are also CoR members, or have direct corporate ties to members. The same goes for the CFR and the Trilateral Commission.

A recently unearthed documentary that sought to expose this agenda at its inception is George Hunt’s excellent research piece on the environmental movement.

Considering the information unearthed concerning Obama’s links to all of this, it is not surprising that he is now pushing the “cap-and-trade” carbon tax program, which in reality represents a war on the middle and working classes.

Prior to the election, Obama called for drastically reducing carbon emissions by 80 per cent, a move that would inflict a new Great Depression, cost millions of jobs, and sink America to near third world status.

The 80 per cent figure is a huge leap towards the ultimate goal, expressed by the Carnegie Institute last year and afforded sober credibility by the corporate media - a complete reduction down to zero carbon emissions.

As we have previously noted, such a move would lead to the near complete reversal of hundreds of years of technological progress and man’s return to the stone age.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/research-reports-obama-intimately-tied-to-phony-environmental-movement.html



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"

Around the Network

I must be missing something obvious, but can someone explain why this would be scandalous if true?



He is apparently part of the NWO and is set to enslave the majority of human race. Actually, if it is true he'd probably have a tarnished record like cheney did for the no-bid to haliburton.

Of course, I imagine it depends on whether he is profiting from it or not. Which raises an interesting question. From the start of the iraq war to 2007 senators and congressman made a shitload on investments (many speculate that they were in defense contractors-does this constitute insider trading?). Watch Alex Jones on youtube, this is from his site. He's a 9/11 conspiracy/NWO/North American Union (basically anything the government regulates is to destroy mankind).

The only thing I find hard to believe is that their is a hyper-competent shadow government lurking somewhere.



In other news Obama enslaves the american people through alternative energy and hybrid cars. That bastard. Next you know hes going to start sending christians to camps to be killed so that he and his islamic extremist pals can take over.



[2:08:58 am] Moongoddess256: being asian makes you naturally good at ddr
[2:09:22 am] gnizmo: its a weird genetic thing
[2:09:30 am] gnizmo: goes back to hunting giant crabs in feudal Japan

jv103 said:
He is apparently part of the NWO and is set to enslave the majority of human race. Actually, if it is true he'd probably have a tarnished record like cheney did for the no-bid to haliburton.

Of course, I imagine it depends on whether he is profiting from it or not. Which raises an interesting question. From the start of the iraq war to 2007 senators and congressman made a shitload on investments (many speculate that they were in defense contractors-does this constitute insider trading?). Watch Alex Jones on youtube, this is from his site. He's a 9/11 conspiracy/NWO/North American Union (basically anything the government regulates is to destroy mankind).

The only thing I find hard to believe is that their is a hyper-competent shadow government lurking somewhere.

Not too sound rude when I say this but do you actually read the news? The plans for a North American Union are very real. The IMF, U,N, most E.U countries, Russia China, are supporting a global currency and will be a huge focus point on how to implent it when the G20 is held, and since november 2008, there have been hundreds of articles in newspapers and magazine's from TIme, London Time's New York Times ect that have headlines like "and now for a new world order",ect.

It's not really conspiracy, it's all out in the open now.

 

 



" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"

Around the Network
Nirvana_Nut85 said:
jv103 said:
He is apparently part of the NWO and is set to enslave the majority of human race. Actually, if it is true he'd probably have a tarnished record like cheney did for the no-bid to haliburton.

Of course, I imagine it depends on whether he is profiting from it or not. Which raises an interesting question. From the start of the iraq war to 2007 senators and congressman made a shitload on investments (many speculate that they were in defense contractors-does this constitute insider trading?). Watch Alex Jones on youtube, this is from his site. He's a 9/11 conspiracy/NWO/North American Union (basically anything the government regulates is to destroy mankind).

The only thing I find hard to believe is that their is a hyper-competent shadow government lurking somewhere.

Not too sound rude when I say this but do you actually read the news? The plans for a North American Union are very real. The IMF, U,N, most E.U countries, Russia China, are supporting a global currency and will be a huge focus point on how to implent it when the G20 is held, and since november 2008, there have been hundreds of articles in newspapers and magazine's from TIme, London Time's New York Times ect that have headlines like "and now for a new world order",ect.

It's not really conspiracy, it's all out in the open now.

 

 

 

NAFTA created a proxy NAU, but the term is thrown around so much that I'm wondering what it would actually entail. Simply the currency (which has been discussed but not by the administration as far as I know) or sovereignty? Even though absolute soveregnity has been gone since we joined the UN and NATO (even though they don't have power to enforce the laws that we break on occasion)

I've heard of it all, but I'm wondering in what realistic scenario will the U.S. cease to exist and/or what would the North American Union entail?

 

I also saw the interview with Vicente fox a year or two ago which is quite interesting.



Although i agree that CT is a revenue raising exercise i also agree that Gore is right to support global consensus and the masses of evidence proving climate change.

Why don't you read about Clean Coal Technology, its not proven and despite all this global support is at best only 40% efficient.

The one thing you shouldn't do is quote a Fox News story if your trying to be percieved as independent of bias or conservative views.



“When we make some new announcement and if there is no positive initial reaction from the market, I try to think of it as a good sign because that can be interpreted as people reacting to something groundbreaking. ...if the employees were always minding themselves to do whatever the market is requiring at any moment, and if they were always focusing on something we can sell right now for the short term, it would be very limiting. We are trying to think outside the box.” - Satoru Iwata - This is why corporate multinationals will never truly understand, or risk doing, what Nintendo does.

Global warming is a lie. We contribute some and need to clean up more but the atmosphere is like 1 percent carbon. Anyone heard of volcanoes? How about the cyclical nature of solar output. Hears something Gore and friends don't tell you: Mars' ice caps are melting, Jupiter's composition is changing as well as melting of it's icy moons, and many other solar system bodies are melting. Also, they leave out the Mini Ice Age in their calculations.



Terrible article. Global warming isn't a lie.



 

 

come off it you radicals he won and you lost. it's pathetic. Turn on your tears becksters.