valen200 (on 15 December 2010) game was inferior to first. bought it heavily discounted used and still disapointed
Red4ADevil (on 21 January 2010) Even vicarious visions didnt make this version (the ones that made first one)
dark_gh0st_b0y (on 19 January 2010) that's what happens when you remove motion controls from Wii games...
IGN hated the motion controls on the 1st game and said they were pointless.... so what?
who cares what IGN thinks, Wii love motion controls of 1st Marvel Alliance
spurgeonryan (on 16 October 2009) It obviously cost them less to make for the wii and the success of the others will offset the loss on the Wii. Hopefully?
dark_gh0st_b0y (on 10 October 2009) bluh, there a slight improvement in graphics, characters and content, but.......motion controls are removed and this makes the game VERY boring!!
YoshiLimbo (on 07 October 2009) I was really looking forward to this game, but they put no effort into the Wii version at all! No buy from me.
Tuulikk (on 01 October 2009) @ mandisc - Simply that the graphics ain't cell shaded ain't enough for me. I don't even mind cell shading. What I want is more detail to charters, environment and textures at least. Simply progress from the previous game, even if small.
mandisc (on 28 September 2009) im enjoying it. Must have pumped 8 hours into it over the last 2 days. Tuulikk - I would say the graphics are better as they arent cell shaded but to be honest the wii could blow these out of the water with little effort (dead space, darkside chronicles are two that prove that point)
Tuulikk (on 28 September 2009) Does the Wii version have any better graphics then the old Ultimate Alliance on Wii?
palancas7 (on 25 September 2009) Why would they buy the wii version even if it's not that good? -_-
spurgeonryan (on 24 September 2009) I hope people actually buy the Wii version, then maybe companies will start putting more effort into all system wide ports (mainly wii).
ash3336 (on 21 May 2009) This game is heavily anticipated by many of my friends. Hope it is good.